Perhaps I have taken far too long to write these reflections on being part of the Open Educational Resources 2016 conference 19-20 April or – as I like to think of my procrastination – the experience of #OER16 has stayed with me and has been churning away at the back of my mind.
It was great to have the opportunity to co-present with Andrew Middleton. Our presentation was based on a number of conversations about in-between space and for my part specifically my interest in the concept of liminality in relation to spaces and other practices. As Andrew writes we were playing around with re-imagining the Open Educational Resources framework as Open Educational Relationships and what this might mean in terms of the R definitions outlined by Wiley Retain, Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute)
This reimagining was in response to the OER conference theme of Open Culture and my view that culture points to a new focus on people and practices rather than the content focus that the term OER seems to imply. So we were in a process of redefining the 5Rs from the standpoint of open being about spaces, identities and networks rather than content.
It was great to see so many people focusing on re-framing or rethinking the notions of open education and what OER meant. So for example there was a lot of overlap in thinking between our presentation and the presentation by Suzan Koseoglu and Maha Bali on The Self as an Open Educational Resource where they emphasized the value of the processes and products of open scholarship.
For me the best conference moments were getting to meet and talk to people with such passion for their research and their work, some I had met before, some I followed on Twitter but also, of course, new people and this formed a great mix. It was a treat to be part of a fascinating conversation about Ravelry, knitting and weaving with Frances Bell and Jim Groom, who later went on to deliver an energetic keynote, Can we imagine tech Infrastructure as an Open Educational Resource? Or, Clouds, Containers, and APIs, Oh My! You should definitely watch the keynote and pay special attention to the unique introduction of the speaker.
The keynote, If ‘open’ is the answer, what is the question? by Catherine Cronin was great in making us think about the many interpretations of ‘open’ and levels of ‘openess’ as well as exploring participatory culture and networks. See the fantastic sketch note by Beck Pitt below.
For me the most important take away from OER16 is to look/think beyond institutions and institutional structures and spaces, to the level of the individual as well as the collective level. I am still working through what this means for me and what I do.
Other OER16 posts:
- On Andrew Middleton’s blog there are quite a few posts around our presentation, pre and post conference and they are great thinking pieces pondering ideas around open education, liminality, third space, third place, interstitial etc.
- Frances Bell did an amazing job live blogging a number of keynotes and sessions and you should definitely take a look.
- OER16: Open Culture Conference Overview by Lorna Campbell, conference co-chair with Melissa Highton
- Jim Groom also rounded up his belated thoughts on OER16 in OER16, Ah’m Yer Da
- The post by Catherine Cronin is also a great perspective on OER conference and how Open Education research is developing #OER16: a critical turn